Children are being taught in toilets and cupboards in North East schools due to overcrowding, it has emerged.
One Northumberland school is turning pupils away and being forced to teach children in make-shift classrooms, including the garden shed.
Central First School in Ashington, which bought a double decker bus on eBay for use as a temporary classroom last year, is finding new means of teaching its ever-growing pupil population.
Principal David Godfrey said:
“We’ve had to turn toilets and cupboards into working spaces.
“We’ve had to turn structures outside into working areas for displaying artwork and for teaching the STEM subjects.
“We have a very good reputation as a school and we’re full to capacity. Regrettably we’re having to turn pupils away.”
The news comes as parents rush to meet the deadline for primary school applications this week.
However, more than 80 schools across the North East are overcrowded.
North councils have revealed that almost one in five primary schools have more pupils than they have capacity for – forcing many children into large classes or temporary, make-shift classrooms.
In parts of the region, more than a third of primary schools are currently over capacity.
The figures were provided by local councils in response to Freedom of Information requests from the Labour Party.
Labour claim they show a desperate need for more school places – and accuse the Government of pumping money into new free schools at the expense of existing schools.
Free schools were introduced by the Coalition government and are free from local council control.
Mr Godfrey said more funding is needed for oversubscribed schools to either extend their classrooms or re-build from scratch.
“I think there has to be more funding,” he said. “Especially now the Government introduced free education to two-year-olds from low income families.
“Schools are having to accommodate this quota without any investment from central Government in the existing buildings.”
There are nine primary schools in North Tyneside which currently have more pupils than the official capacity – 36 per cent of the total, or more than one in three.
There are also two secondary schools in the area which are over capacity.
In South Tyneside, 11 primary schools are over capacity, just under a quarter of the total, as well as two secondary schools.
County Durham has 28 primary schools and five secondary schools which operating above capacity, while Newcastle has six overcrowded primary schools and two secondaries, and Northumberland has four primary schools operating above capacity. Figures for Sunderland were not available.
Tristram Hunt, Labour’s Shadow Education Secretary, said:
“David Cameron is irresponsibly diverting millions away from children in areas with a shortage of school places in order to fund his pet project Free Schools programme in areas where there are already enough places.
“This is affecting school standards and creating a classroom squeeze, with more infants being crammed into large classes and pupils being taught in makeshift temporary classrooms.
“Unlike this Tory-led Government, Labour has the right priorities for raising school standards. We will prioritise new school places in areas where there are shortages, have rigorous local oversight of schools and ensure that all teachers have or are working towards qualified teacher status.”
Four out of five free schools opened last year did not fill all their places.
Responses to Freedom of Information requests, also filed by Labour, showed that 83 per cent of Free Schools that opened in 2014 had not filled all their places at the start of the first term.
Only seven of the16 new mainstream secondary Free Schools opened last year were full.
Conservative Education Minister Nick Gibb said:
“This government has had to deal with an unprecedented increase in demand for school places. We have only been able to do this because of the tough decisions we have taken as part of our long-term economic plan to get the economy back on track.
“As a result, we have protected the school budget from cuts, invested an extra £5 billion to create new school places and spent £18 billion to improve school buildings across the country. Indeed, one of the first decisions we took in 2010 was to double the amount of money allocated to creating new school places.
“By contrast, the last Labour Government cut funding for school places during a baby boom while allowing immigration to get out of control, and wasted millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money on their failed ‘Building Schools for the Future’ programme.”
Source – Newcastle Evening Chronicle, 13 Jan 2015
On the same day that the government announced it was scrapping the £180-million-a-year Social Fund for the destitute, a new survey showed that the big US internet companies operating in Britain have increased their UK sales last year by 18 per cent but paid even less tax to the Treasury than the year before.
Apple UK made £1 billion this country in 2011, but paid only £15.7m in tax. Last year its UK turnover rose £1.2bn, but its tax payments vanished to almost nothing – £1.7m, or precisely 0.1 per cent of turnover.
Facebook made £20m in the UK in 2011 and paid an almost invisible £200,000 in tax.
Last year its turnover nearly doubled to £35m, but its tax payments to Britain shrivelled to nothing at all.
Taking all the seven companies together – Apple UK, Google, Microsoft, eBay, Yahoo UK, Facebook UK and Amazon UK – their turnover in the UK last year was just under £3bn, but their tax payments totalled just £51m, or 1.7 per cent of turnover.
At the other end of the scale the Social Fund is being wound up by the Tories – something even Thatcher refused to do.
The Social Fund is the last helpline for the poorest families in extreme distress, often brought on by an unexpected financial crisis.
This last-resort lifebelt has been in place for the hardest-hit ever since 1948 and its removal will devastate families, often including children, leaving them literally destitute.
The Tories will no doubt argue that it’s part of the drive to make savings to reduce the budget deficit.
That claim won’t pass muster for two reasons. First, the deficit last year was £111bn, so cutting £180m will save 0.16 per cent – an enormously painful and destructive cut for an utterly minuscule saving.
Second, tackling the corporate tax cheats would be far fairer and produce vastly more money.
So why doesn’t the government get serious about industrial-scale tax avoidance?
Partly because HMRC has been significantly scaled back – and it started under Blair and Brown – as a result of industrial lobbying.
And partly because the Tories get half their annual income each year from the finance sector, so Cameron, Osborne and co aren’t going to touch the biggest tax crooks of all with a bargepole.
Of course the companies will come up with their usual plaintive mantra that they’re complying with the tax laws.
What they mean is they devise the most artificial contrivances they can think of to circumvent the weak and inadequate tax regulations that exist, knowing perfectly well that their practices are aggressively anti-social and contravene the national interest, but as long as they don’t actually fall foul of the letter of the law they have no interest in Britain whatever and will go on feathering their own nests – as well as, of course, the Tories’.
Source – BS News, 09 Jan 2014