Food Banks Concentrated In Areas Hit Hardest By Benefit Sanctions, Study Finds

> Coming soon – the Pope is a Catholic, study finds….

Austerity policies such as cuts to welfare and local services are driving the rapid spread of food banks in the UK, according to an academic study.

The Oxford University research shows emergency food aid is most concentrated in areas where there are high levels of joblessness and benefit sanctions.

The Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition persistently refused to acknowledge a link between its economic and social security policies and the explosion in food banks.

But the Oxford study, published in the British Medical Journal, shows demand for food parcels is strongest where poverty is accompanied by restrictions on, and reductions in, social assistance.

It concludes:

“More food banks are opening in areas experiencing greater cuts in spending on local services and central welfare benefits and higher unemployment rates.”

The study, which uses data supplied by the UK’s biggest food bank network, the Trussell Trust, finds food banks operated in 20 UK council areas in 2009-10. By 2013-14 they existed in 251 areas.

At the same time, the rate of food aid distribution tripled between 2010 and 2013 from about 0.6 food parcels per 100 people to 2.2 per 100.

There were stark variations between local areas, from a low of less than 0.1 food parcels per 100 people in Lichfield, Staffordshire, to a high of eight parcels per 100 in Newcastle-upon-Tyne.

These in part reflected the fact that some areas had more or longer-established food banks, the study found.

Even taking this into account, higher rates of food parcel distribution were still “significantly associated” with welfare cuts and austerity measures.

In particular, the prevalence in an area of benefit sanctions – where unemployed claimants who do not meet jobcentre rules have their payments stopped for at least four weeks – was a strong indicator of food parcel use.

The study says:

“The rise in food bank use is … concentrated in communities where more people are experiencing benefit sanctions.

“Food parcel distribution is higher in areas where food banks are more common and better established, but our data also show that the local authorities with greater rates of sanctions and austerity are experiencing greater rates of people seeking emergency food assistance.”

A spokesperson for the Department for Work and Pensions said:

“The government spends £94bn a year on working-age benefits and provides a wide range of advice and assistance for anyone in need of additional support.

“The vast majority of benefits are processed on time with improvements being made year on year and the number of sanctions has actually gone down.”

The lead author of the study, Rachel Loopstra, said it was likely to have “underestimated the true burden of food insecurity in the UK” because food aid provision is patchy and data collection is relatively crude.

She called for further research to capture the full extent of food insecurity and food bank use in the UK. One of the last acts of the coalition was to reject a cross-party call for the government to collect robust data on food poverty.

The study is the latest in a string of separate reports linking welfare reform to food bank use, from poverty charities, churches, MPs, and food banks.

Source – The Guardian, 09 Apr 2015

Advertisements

3 comments

  1. Chris

    The bulk of people going to foodbanks are in work, who are the majority of the poor today.

    Universal Benefit will bring in permanent sanctions, from Hardship Payments becoming recoverable loans by direct deductions from wages or benefits by court action.

    Universal Benefit will absorb working tax credit and housing benefit (and talk of including council tax support) and sanction part time workers for failing to do the impossible of achieving full time hours, when most new jobs since 2008 have been low waged part time or low income self employed.

    And poor pensioners are the hidden malnurished, on the lowest state pension of all rich nations, going to charitable lunch clubs.

    But foodbanks are not what is provided by EU funding in Europe, where councils/charities provide a 7 day a week, free cafe with a cooked hot meal and hot drink to the working poor, poor pensioners and unemployed alike.

    Few foodbanks offer a cooked meal, and there is a need for vouchers restricted mostly to 3 a year.

    Hospitals doctors say there has been a huge rise in malnutrition hospital admissions.
    GPs talk amongst themselves about the rise of the hunger sympton in kids of Rickets, affecting their bone development.

    VOTE OUT TORIES
    VOTE SMALL PARTIES OF THE LEFT
    SOLE WAY TO GET A MAJORITY UK PARLIAMENT
    OF A GROUP OF PARTIES REACHING THE 323-326 MP THRESHOLD

    Examples:

    If you want rid of IAIN DUNCAN SMITH
    
Chingford and Wood Green (London)

    Tories won with 22,734 votes in 2010

    21,725 did not vote in 2010

    9,780 votes wasted on Labour in 2010
    7,242 votes wasted on Lib Dems in 2010

    VOTE CLASS WAR
    
Liza McKenzie
    
Fellow (Professor) London School of Economics.

    If you want rid of PRIME MINISTER CAMERON

    Witney voting area

    Tories won with 33,973 votes

    20,997 did not vote

    7,511 votes wasted on Labour
    11,233 votes wasted on Lib Dems

    VOTE WITNEY:

    National Health Action
    Clive Peedell

    if you want rid of THERESA MAY

    Voting area Maidenhead

    31,937 Tory win in 2010
    19,124 did not vote in 2010

    3,795 votes wasted on Labour in 2010
    15,168 votes wasted on Lib Dems in 2010

    VOTE MAIDENHEAD – CLASS WAR

    Class War
    Joe Wilcox

    If you want rid of JEREMY HUNT

    Voting area SOUTH WEST SURREY

    33,605 votes Tory win

    19,242 did not vote in 2010

    3,419 votes wasted on Labour in 2010
    17,287 votes wasted on Lib Dem in 2010

    VOTE
 SOUTH WEST SURREY
    National Health Action
    Louise Irvine

    NOW THAT HAS GOT TO BE A MUST, PLEASE …… !!

    WHO ARE THE PARTIES OF THE POOR OF THE LEFT?
    TO SHARE BY WORD OF MOUTH WITH YOUR CAMPAIGN GROUPS
    AND ON TWITTER ACCOUNTS

    http://www.anastasia-england.me.uk

    • untynewear

      Chris, given the scope of this blog is North East England perhaps you could tailor your comments to the locale ?

      There are no Class War candidates here, and we get to hear a bit too much about the Home Counties as it is.

      Here the alternative choice is Greens (just about all constituencies), TUSC (a handful) or North East Party (4, I think).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s